Connect with us

Celebrity

Court Orders Multichoice To Pay N150m Fine And Give Nigerians One Month Free Subscription (DETAIL)

Published

on

The Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (CCPT), sitting in Abuja awarded a fine of N150 million against MultiChoice Nigeria Limited for disrespecting its jurisdiction by flouting its order.
The Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (CCPT), sitting in Abuja awarded a fine of N150 million against MultiChoice Nigeria Limited for disrespecting its jurisdiction by flouting its order.       A three-man panel led by Thomas Okusu gave the verdict on Friday, June 7.      The tribunal had previously blocked Multichoice from raising subscription fees without proper notice, based on a lawsuit by Barrister Festus Onifade who claimed the eight-day notice given for the price increase was inadequate.      Onifade had sued DSTV, accusing the Pay-TV of unjustly increasing subscription fees without one month’s notice to customers and leveraging on it to seek interim orders.      The tribunal, in a unanimous decision by its three-member panel, ordered MultiChoice to pay a fine of N150 million and also to provide Nigerians with a one-month free subscription to its DSTV and GOTV services.      The tribunal subsequently fixed July 3 to hear the substantive action that was instituted against the company.

A three-man panel led by Thomas Okusu gave the verdict on Friday, June 7.
 

The tribunal had previously blocked Multichoice from raising subscription fees without proper notice, based on a lawsuit by Barrister Festus Onifade who claimed the eight-day notice given for the price increase was inadequate.
 

Onifade had sued DSTV, accusing the Pay-TV of unjustly increasing subscription fees without one month’s notice to customers and leveraging on it to seek interim orders.
 

The tribunal, in a unanimous decision by its three-member panel, ordered MultiChoice to pay a fine of N150 million and also to provide Nigerians with a one-month free subscription to its DSTV and GOTV services.
 

The tribunal subsequently fixed July 3 to hear the substantive action that was instituted against the company

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

< /div>
error: Content is protected !!